Joined: 10 Apr 2005 Posts: 10203 Location: United Arab Emirates or an airport
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:12 pm Post subject:
explorerJC wrote:
Not once in the article did they mention prosecution where there was no evidence to justify such an action; neither did i either assume this may be the case nor did i infer it.
All of that was inferred by you and created by you. Take some responsibility for your posts.
Oh and I appreciate that this has been a struggle for you, but less of the slander please, there's a good lad...
They demanded prosecutions. a Prosecution requires evidence so they were demanding something without knowing if there was any evidence.
You said; "prosecute high-profile people with financial interests in offshore tax havens."
Sounds pretty much like a prosecution demand, regardless of circumstances. The demand states there are guilty people there who should be prosecuted.
Nowhere do they demand that evidence is gathered to determine if a prosecution is warranted. Just to go out and prosecute anyone with money in a tax haven.
Senility seems to be setting in there old chap - has Nursie been around yet to tuck you in ?
_________________ Arguing with engineers is like wrestling in mud with a pig - after a while you realise they like it
newMan : I don't know why you think you can address me like that! Don't ever reply directly to any of my posts again please.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Albums
Memberlist
Bloglist
Wiki
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
